This page answers the question that arrives in most of our manufacturing enquiries (whether you came in searching for a private label massager manufacturer or a pelvic massager OEM): do you take contract work, and how does it actually run? The short answer is yes — private label, ODM and full custom — and the numbers are published rather than kept for a call. The entry minimum is 100 units on five stock SKUs, 300 for a private-label run in a standard colour, 500 for a modified design, 1,000 for a new mould. A stock sample ships in three to five business days; bulk production runs 25 to 35 days after sample approval and deposit.
One thing has to be said before the rest of it, because it is the difference between this page and a factory brochure: we are a brief desk, not a plant. The devices are built by our manufacturing partners to a specification we publish, and every number on the catalogue pages is that specification. We take no commission from either side of an introduction, which is also why this page can tell you where the traps are in a quotation instead of which model to buy.
For buyers who arrive searching for a private label intimate wellness manufacturer or an OEM massager manufacturer rather than a finished catalogue: the questions that actually decide the programme — body-safe silicone to ISO 10993, a platinum-cure process, IPX7 waterproofing and a measured decibel level — are documented per SKU on the catalogue pages, and the economics behind each tier are worked through in the MOQ pricing guide. The compliance set a buyer must carry (EU GPSR Responsible Person, US FDA 21 CFR 177.2600, CE / RoHS / REACH, ISO 13485 and ISO 9001) is summarised on the sourcing desk.
Do you take OEM and private-label work, and how does it start?
Yes — private label from 300 units, modified design under ODM from 500, and full custom from 1,000, across 9 catalogue SKUs in body-safe silicone and ABS. It starts with a written brief: target market, first-order quantity, intended annual volume, what you want changed, and the target landed cost. You get back a written scope with the route, the tier, the tooling position, the lead time stage by stage and the documents that will travel with the goods. The catalogue page for each SKU already carries its MOQ, lead time, material and certification set, so you can check most of it before you write to us at all.
- Entry minimum from 100 units on stock SKUs · 300 private label · 500 ODM · 1,000 new mould
- Sample in 3–5 business days, bulk in 25–35 days after approval and deposit
- 30% deposit, 70% before shipment — never 100% upfront on a first order
- Tooling ownership written into the purchase order, not agreed verbally
What we actually manufacture
The catalogue is deliberately narrow: body-safe silicone and ABS devices for intimate wellness, in formats from a 93 g dual-motor unit up to full-size rechargeable models. Every SKU states its material, its protection rating, its documented runtime and its measured noise on its own page. That narrowness is the point — a factory that quotes you everything from silicone to electronics to cosmetics is a trading company with a catalogue of other people’s factories, and the moment something goes wrong there is nobody in the building who can fix it.
What we do not quote, and would rather say here than waste your time on a call: PVC and jelly materials, realistic anatomical moulds, novelty and joke lines, medical devices or anything carrying a therapeutic claim, and private-label electronics assembled from components with no test report. The last one matters most. A device with a lithium cell but no UN38.3 or IEC 62133 report cannot legally fly, and often cannot sail, which is a landed-cost problem that appears after the goods are made.
The same logic applies one layer up. If the device ships with an app, ask for the firmware update policy in writing before you commit: who signs the build, how long after the last shipment updates are supported, and what happens to the hardware if the companion app is withdrawn or the vendor behind it disappears. A massager that stops being updateable is not a warranty question, it is a review question, and it arrives long before the second order.
OEM, ODM, private label, white label — the four words procurement uses
These four words are used interchangeably in supplier emails and they describe four different commercial relationships with four different price points. Getting them straight before a first call saves a negotiation, so they are set out here on the six things that actually differ rather than as definitions. The rest of a procurement lead's vocabulary (Trade Assurance, an ISO 9001 scope, a BSCI or SEDEX audit badge, a live factory-tour video, a second source for every critical component) is the verification layer that sits on top of the route, and it is covered on the [sourcing stage page](/for-brands/sourcing/).
The distinction that costs the most money is intellectual property. The Wikipedia entry Original design manufacturer is blunt about it: in an ODM arrangement, unless one explicitly purchases the IP, the manufacturer retains it — which means the manufacturer can sell the same product to your competitors. A private-label agreement is a subset of that: you own your logo and your artwork, and you do not own the device. Mould exclusivity (a written term that the tool will not be used for another brand) is the only thing that converts a modified design into a defensible one, and it is negotiated, not assumed.
Before a route is settled, five requests check the supplier itself, and none of them costs anything. Ask for a virtual factory tour recorded that week — raw-material storage, the assembly line, the QC station — rather than an edited showreel. Ask where mould ownership sits once the tool is paid for, because a supplier who keeps the tool can sell your shape to a competitor.
Send an NDA that covers the artwork and the source files, and confirm which parts are NDA-protected moulds and which are public. Ask which process forms the silicone: LSR injection moulding (liquid silicone rubber) yields a seam-free platinum-cure part, while compression moulding is cheaper and leaves a parting line. And where colour is the point of difference, ask for a Pantone colour matching round on a physical chip before the run, not a screen preview after it.
| Route | Who designs it | Who owns the design | Exclusive? | Entry quantity | Time to first sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White label | Nobody — it already exists | The manufacturer | No. The same unit is sold to other brands | 100 units | 3–5 business days |
| Private label | The manufacturer; you specify colour, logo, packaging | The manufacturer keeps the design; you own your brand assets | On your artwork, not on the product | 300 units, 500 with a custom colour or logo | 3–5 business days on stock, longer on a colour match |
| ODM — modified design | The manufacturer, modified to your brief | The manufacturer, unless the IP is purchased | Negotiable, as a written term | 500 units | After a tooling or firmware change |
| Full custom / OEM | You, or you and the factory together | You, if you paid for the tooling and the design | Yes, because the tool is yours | 1,000 units | After the mould is cut and a first article is approved |
Read the last two columns together. The route that gives you a defensible product is four times the commitment of the route that gives you a product this month, and no amount of negotiating closes that gap, because it is not a margin — it is the cost of a mould. Our MOQ pricing guide works through what a factory is actually recovering at each tier.
Which route fits your stage
The most expensive mistake in this category is buying the route a brand thinks it should have rather than the one its volume can carry. A first order is a test, and a test should be cheap enough to survive being wrong.
| If you are here | The route that fits | What you get for it | What it costs you later |
|---|---|---|---|
| Validating whether the product sells at all | Stock SKU with your label | A real product in your packaging at the lowest commitment in the catalogue | Nothing is defensible: a competitor can buy the identical unit tomorrow |
| Selling, and needing the product to look like yours | Private label | Your colour, your logo, your retail packaging, your manual language | The design is still the factory’s, so the point of difference is cosmetic |
| Beating a competitor on a feature | ODM modified design | A motor, firmware or control layout you specified | Half the investment of a mould, half the protection of one |
| Building something a competitor cannot copy | Full custom, new mould | A shape, a mechanism and a tool that belongs to you | A five-figure commitment before a single unit is sold, and a tool that is only worth its cost at volume |
Three routes, three different answers to the same question: how much of this product is actually yours?
How many of the 12 attributes you can change, by route
Private label changes six of the twelve attributes; a new mould changes all twelve. The price gap between them is the gap between ordering and designing.
Two honest observations from the enquiries that reach us. First, most first orders should be private label, not custom — the packaging is what a customer sees, and it is a fraction of the cost of a mould. Second, the brands that escalate to a new mould almost always do it on the second or third order for a product that has already sold, never on the first for a product that has not.
MOQ, tier by tier
Read this before the price table. The route decides the minimum, not the other way round — and a buyer who picks the route after negotiating the price negotiates twice.
Entry quantity by manufacturing route
The gap between the first row and the last is 10×: the same category of product, with a new mould, asks for ten times the commitment.
A minimum order quantity is not a demand forecast and it is not a negotiating position. It is the number of units over which a fixed setup cost gets spread. That cost is the mould, the colour change, the print plates, the packaging run and the line time — and it is different for every route, which is why a supplier quoting one number for everything is usually quoting the smallest setup cost in their range and cannot actually deliver the product you asked about.
Three things move the number, and none of them is asking for a discount. A written volume ramp — a small first order with the second and third committed in the same document — changes the factory’s risk calculation, because the setup is now spread over a known sequence rather than a hope. An itemised cost breakdown shows which of the charges are genuinely fixed and which are padding. And narrowing what you want changed lowers the setup cost the minimum has to recover: dropping a custom carton can move a 500-unit minimum down to a 300-unit one, and it is usually the first thing to drop.
Tooling: cost, ownership, amortisation, transfer
This is the section that decides whether a first order is an asset or a hostage situation, and it is the one most supplier pages leave vague. Four questions, in the order they should be asked: who pays for the tool, who owns it, how is it accounted for, and can it leave.
This is not a quotation, it is a division. Put your own tooling quote in the numerator and the shape does not change.
What one tooling spend costs per unit, indexed to 1,000
Moving from 300 units to 5,000 spreads the identical tooling spend 16.7 times thinner.
The economics are a division, not a secret. A tool is a fixed cost, so its weight in the unit price is the tooling spend divided by the number of units you commit to — which is exactly why the same product can look cheap at 5,000 units and absurd at 300. This is the mechanism behind economies of scale, and it is also why the minimum order quantity exists at all. Adam Smith’s observation that the division of labour is limited by the extent of the market [Smith, 1776] is the same argument in its original form: a small order does not merely cost more per unit, it cannot be made the same way at all.
Ownership is a separate question from payment, and conflating the two is the expensive mistake. A dedicated mould is what economists call a specific asset: it has little value to anyone but the two parties, which gives whoever holds it leverage over whoever needs it. That is the hold-up problem set out in [Williamson, 1985], and in this industry it shows up as a brand that paid for a tool, then discovered the tool does not travel. The defence is documentary, and it is short:
- If you pay for the tool in full, you own it. The purchase order names the tool, the amount and the transfer obligation, and transfer happens on request to a moulder you nominate.
- If the tooling is amortised, the schedule has an end date. The amount, the number of units, the per-unit figure and the date ownership passes are all written down. A per-unit rate with no end date is a charge that never stops.
- No re-setup fee on a repeat order. A repeat of an existing colourway should not carry a fresh setup charge. If it does, the first setup was never fully paid off.
- Ask for both quotes. Upfront and amortised, at your volume, with the total cash out compared rather than the unit price.
The same reasoning explains why a 300-unit order should never be a custom one: at that volume the tool is most of the unit price, you have paid for an asset whose value depends entirely on a relationship you have not tested yet, and the per-unit number will look worse than the stock product for a reason that has nothing to do with quality.
Three deeper pages: procurement, quality, compliance
This overview covers the four routes, the minimum order quantities, tooling ownership and what a sample can prove. Three companion pages go deeper, each written to the same standard as this one:
- OEM procurement — the RFQ vocabulary, the quotation checklist, payment terms, Incoterms and lead time stage by stage.
- Quality control — AQL sampling under ISO 2859-1, telling a plant from a trading company, factory audit and the supplier scorecard.
- Compliance — CE and the EU GPSR responsible person, intellectual property, and Amazon FBA gated categories.
If what you actually need is not manufacturing but a measurement, the same desk runs the bench: the five-criterion protocol, the devices that have run it, and the 90-day plan that puts a first order in the order it has to happen. And when a run does not sell, the exit guide works through the delisting calendar and what the unsold stock is actually worth.