Disclosure: every commercial relationship we have

This page lists every commercial relationship behind SirenPicks, in one place, in plain language. If something here is unclear, that is a bug in this page rather than a nuance — tell us and we will fix the wording.

How does SirenPicks make money, and does it affect the reviews?

Three declared surfaces, one dormant. Running: our own device line, and bench time or data licences bought by brands. Dormant: affiliate commission on outbound retailer links — zero pages carry one, which is the fourth row of the chart on this page and is recomputed on every build. None of the three can move a score: we own SirenPicks and say so on every page while testing it on the identical protocol, and a data licence buys access to measurements, never a verdict.

  • The whole list is two items. Affiliate commission and our own device line. Nothing else funds this site.
  • Free samples are disclosed on the article and can score negatively — several have.
  • Nothing is for sale that changes an outcome — not a score, a ranking, a placement or a kind word.
  • Full details: the table below maps every relationship to where it is disclosed and whether it can affect a score.

Every relationship, at a glance

Every commercial relationship, and its ability to move a score
RelationshipDisclosed whereCan it change a score?
Affiliate links on some outbound retailer linksAt the top of any article containing one, and on this page.No. The score is fixed from the test results before any link is chosen.
Free review units and samples from brandsOn the article itself, in the disclosure block below the scores.No. Supplied units run the identical protocol and can score negatively.
Our ownership of the SirenPicks device lineFooter of every page, every own-brand pick, the ownership policy, and our organisation structured data.No. Identical protocol and weights; competitors rank first where they win a criterion.
Paid bench time and data licences (brands, retail)In the engagement scope and in this page's section on what we do not do.No. The fee covers bench time and citation rights, never the verdict.
OEM and wholesale introductionsThis page and the For Brands page.No. We take no commission from either side, so the introduction does not depend on a fee.
Optional Google Analytics 4The consent banner and the privacy policy, including the cookie table.No. It is measurement only, opt-in, and sets no advertising cookies.
Display advertising, sponsored posts, paid rankings, paid linksNot applicable — these do not exist on this site.Not applicable. There is nothing to sell and no inventory to buy.

The first three rows are what a reader can check unaided. The fourth is the one this page exists to hold at zero.

What a reader can check on each page, against what is for sale

Pages with a named author and a date 12 pages
Pages publishing the measurement set 10 pages
Pages reviewing a device we also sell 9 pages
Pages carrying a paid or affiliate link 0 pages

0 of 12 published pages carry a paid or affiliate link today; 9 are about a device we also sell and every one is labelled; 12 of 12 carry a named author.

What a reader can check on each page, against what is for sale. Four counts read from the frontmatter of the 12 pages this site publishes in English, counted at build time rather than written by hand. Rows one to three are what make a claim of independence checkable: a named author answers for what is written, a published measurement set lets a reader recompute a score, and a page about our own device says so on the page. The fourth row is the claim itself — no page currently carries a paid or affiliate link. That is not a forward promise or a policy kept somewhere else; it is a count of the corpus as built, and if an affiliate link is ever activated the bar moves on the next build and this sentence moves with it. A reader who wants to check does not have to take our word for it: open any article and look for the link.

Affiliate commission is a declared source that is currently switched off: not one outbound link here is an affiliate link, and the chart on this page counts that on every build. If one is ever added and you buy through it, the retailer may pay us a commission at no cost to you, and it does not change the price you see.

  • Affiliate status is disclosed at the top of any article that contains an affiliate link.
  • Scores, rankings and verdicts are fixed by the test results before any link is selected.
  • If the best-measured device has no affiliate programme, we still recommend it and link to it without a commission — which is the position every recommendation on this site is in today.
  • We never mark an outbound link as sponsored, because we are not paid for placement — only for a completed sale.

Ownership: we make a device line

SirenPicks owns the SirenPicks device line, and SirenPicks products are recommended in some of our roundups and face-offs. This is disclosed in the footer of every page, labelled on every pick, and explained in full in our ownership policy. In short: identical protocol, explicit "ours" labels, competitors ranked first when they win, and a non-SirenPicks recommendation available on request.

Free samples and review units

Some devices are bought at full retail price; some are sent by brands, distributors or retailers for review. When a unit was supplied, the article says so.

  • A supplied unit is tested on the same protocol, at the same weights, as a bought unit.
  • A supplied unit can receive a negative score, and several have.
  • We do not return units, and we do not accept conditions — no embargo on a negative verdict, no approval of copy, no right of review before publication.
  • We do not accept payment for a review, and we do not charge for the testing of a device submitted through the For Brands route unless it is a paid data project, in which case the arrangement is stated in the resulting coverage.

What we do not do

  • No display advertising. There are no ad networks, no ad tags and no ad cookies on this site.
  • No sponsored posts or paid placements. Nothing on SirenPicks can be bought.
  • No paid links in or out. We do not sell links, and we do not accept payment to link to a retailer.
  • No data sales. We do not sell, rent or trade reader data.

Analytics and cookies

Analytics is optional and off by default. If you allow it, we use Google Analytics 4 to understand which tests are read, with IP anonymisation, Google Signals disabled and ad-personalisation signals disabled. Google tags are not requested at all until you allow them — declining means nothing is sent to Google. No advertising cookies are set, ever. Details, including retention periods and how to withdraw consent, are on the privacy page.

Regulatory and regional notes

SirenPicks publishes editorial content about adult wellness products and is intended for readers aged 18 and over. We are not a retailer and we do not process product orders; purchases are made from third-party retailers under their own terms. Nothing on this site is medical advice — if you have a health concern, speak to a clinician.

If a disclosure looks wrong to you

An undisclosed relationship is the one failure that would invalidate everything else on this site, so it is treated as the highest-priority bug. If you spot a link you suspect is affiliate and unlabelled, an article about a supplied device that does not say so, or any commercial arrangement missing from the table above, send the page and what you think is missing. Corrections of this kind are fixed immediately rather than queued.

What each page of this site rests on

Measured on our bench 30 pages
Rests on a published source 67 pages
The factory's own declaration 30 pages

Every generated page carries a type and the string on the page it is bound to, so a label stops being true the moment the section it describes disappears. 0 pages are typed unverified, and that is the number this site wants to be able to publish.

What each page of this site rests on. All 127 content pages on the site, grouped by what their numbers rest on: 30 were measured on our bench, 67 rest on a published source a reader can open, and 30 reprint what a factory declares about its own product — that last category is bound to the specification table, and the table caption says exactly that, because a factory specification presented as a measurement is the easiest lie to tell in this category. Zero pages are typed unverified: that is not a category that happened to come out empty, it is the one the site aims not to have, so it is printed instead of omitted. The other 50 pages on the domain — contact, the error page and the internal tool — are exempt with a written reason, because they make no claim that could carry a source. The split is counted on every build, and the check fails when a label stops matching its page.

Questions about our disclosures

How is the ownership disclosure different from the affiliate disclosure?

They answer different questions and the two are never merged. An affiliate disclosure says a link may earn a commission on a purchase you make; an ownership disclosure says the publisher also sells a competing product. Both appear on this site, both sit near the top of the article rather than in a footer, and neither substitutes for the other: a page can carry no affiliate link at all and still carry a conflict of interest, which is exactly the case for every SirenPicks device review.

How can I check that nothing on this page is paid for?

Three checks, all from the site itself. Search any article for a sponsored label and find none. Open the editorial policy and confirm that the only arrangement offered to brands is bench time and data licensing, neither of which includes copy approval or a preview of the verdict. Then look at the footer of any page: the ownership statement has to appear whether or not that page mentions a SirenPicks device. If a page fails any of the three, the page is wrong and this policy is what it is being measured against.

How does SirenPicks make money?

Three declared surfaces and one of them is switched off. Running: our own device line, and bench time or data licences sold to brands. Switched off: affiliate commission on outbound retailer links — no page on this site carries one today, and if one is ever added the score is fixed before the link exists and the disclosure sits at the top of that article. There is no display advertising, no sponsored content and no paid placement.

Do you sell links or placements?

No. We do not sell links, we do not sell placements, and we do not accept payment for a ranking or a review. Nothing on the site can be bought that way, and there is no sponsored slot to buy.

Do you own any of the products you recommend?

Yes — SirenPicks owns the device line it reviews and sells. Every SirenPicks entry in a roundup or face-off is labelled as ours, the ownership statement appears in the footer of every page, and the full handling of the conflict is in the editorial policy. You can also ask for the best non-SirenPicks option for your needs.

Do you accept free samples?

Yes, and they are disclosed on the article. A supplied unit runs the same five tests at the same weights as a device we bought ourselves, can receive a negative score, and is never accepted with conditions such as copy approval or an embargo on a negative verdict.

Do you run ads or ad cookies?

No. There are no ad networks, no ad tags and no advertising cookies on this site, and no remarketing or cross-site tracking. Analytics is optional, uses Google Analytics 4 with IP anonymisation and ad signals permanently denied, and does not load at all unless you allow it.

Do you sell reader data?

No. We do not sell, rent or trade reader data, and there are no advertisers to share it with. The only reader data we hold is what you send us or, if you allow it, aggregate analytics.

Do any of the outbound links on this site earn commission?

The disclosure rules permit affiliate links and require each carried article to say so; none currently does. Rather than assert that once and let it rot, the disclosure page recounts the pages carrying an affiliate link on every build, and the number has been zero — you can check the count yourself by opening the page. The two funding surfaces that are actually running are our own device line and paid bench time.

Does owning a device line change how a comparison is written?

It changes what we have to disclose, and nothing else. Own-brand devices run the identical five criteria at the identical published weights, and they are listed behind a competitor whenever the competitor wins on the criterion the reader said they cared about. The ownership statement sits in the footer of every page, including this one, and the about page names the two testers accountable for it.

No fine print

If a relationship is not on this page, it does not exist.

Two funding sources, both disclosed, neither able to move a score. If you find a commercial arrangement missing from this page — a link, a sample, an introduction — that is the most serious bug you can report to us, and it gets fixed immediately.

Why a page like this has to exist

The full trust centre →

A review site that earns nothing from being believed has no reason to be believed. The honest version states the arrangement and then behaves predictably inside it, which is why this page lists what we take rather than what we refuse in principle.

There is a body of work on why a stated arrangement outperforms an implied one — it is the same argument that runs through the standard treatments of how advertising actually works on a buyer and why undisclosed influence is corrosive rather than merely persuasive [Kotler, 2016], and through the analysis of why a defensible position comes from a coherent set of choices rather than from a single advantage [Porter, 1985]. Both are ordinary business literature; neither grants us anything. What grants something is the count printed above this section, which is regenerated on every build from the pages themselves rather than remembered.

Sources cited

  • 《Advertising》 — Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising
  • Porter, Michael E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free Press, New York.
  • Kotler, Philip; Keller, Kevin Lane (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson, Harlow.